In my last entry I discussed how Adam Curtis' observations
in his insightful documentary series Century
of the Self could be used to interpret political situations throughout the
2010's in America, and how a world was created where the average person's
priorities were misdirected based on irrational, unconscious emotions centred
around consumerism. This world is
promoted and reiterated by Big Media to maintain a passive population. As it turns out, the basis of these theories
are based on classic theory of social analysis, deep thinker and sociologist
turned philosopher Jean Baudrillard.
Writing on the relationship between people and objects in the late 60's,
consumerism in 1970 and politics and culture throughout the rest of his career,
Baudrillard's most famous work was a book in 1981, Simulations and Simulacra,
writings that served as inspiration for the Matrix movies.
Humans relationships to objects have changed as the roles
and functions of objects have evolved alongside us, serving as limbs, sensory
objects, or changing how we in turn interact with a third object. Objects originally bought for a primary
function begin to serve a secondary function, and suddenly the secondary qualities
becomes the object's primary purpose.
Baudrillard uses the example of a refrigerator, where all old fridges
used to be white, once they introduced fridges in different colors, suddenly
you must select a fridge based on the color scheme of the rest of the
kitchen. The fridge becomes an accessory
to the kitchen's ensemble, and by proximity becomes a statement made by the
people who live there. A person can
express themselves by the arrangement and relative colors mixing about the
kitchen.
This analysis continues in The Consumer Society and Simulations, where personal expression
is solely done through the purchasing of items in the full spectrum of
imagination, and this is but one component of the Simulacrum, where we live in
a "hyperreality" where mass production and consumption has created a
fakeness or series of reproducible clones.
This ubiquity of copies of objects changes the way we think about
objects, believing in the reproducibility of everything and so attributing a
disposability and temporariness of everything around us. A striking example he uses is Disneyland, a
hyperreal fantasy that we (as a society) not only use to escape the
"reality" that normally surrounds us for a while, but also reaffirms in our minds that the reality
we normally inhabit is not a simulation.
This conviction that we are living in a more "real" reality is
what allows us to continue living in it, and not questioning why the things
around us have to be the way they are.
Century of the Self
examines Bernays marketing techniques, but otherwise paints a similar picture
where social order is based around consumerism, and where objects are given
relationships to powerful emotional symbols based on self-expression. And if you keep stimulating that irrational
self you can maintain the relations of power and control the animalistic forces
by keeping them engaged. Bernays
pioneered the technique of marketing research, meeting with volunteers and
encouraging them to pretend they are consumer products and act out their
relationships with the products.
Similarly, political marketers encouraged people to talk about policies
and how they felt about them, encouraging them to act out these relationships
as well. This was the creation of the
simulacrum that surrounds us presently.
Not only are people engaged in this hyperreality, they are
completely immersed in a reality created by the forces of media, big business
and government. Advertisement campaigns
create emotional attachment by conveying unspoken ideas, encouraging self
expression and activity through the purchase of products. Curtis uses the example of the World's Fair,
creating a Disneyland-esque atmosphere, while surrounding the visitor with the
icons of consumption and self-expression.
4 comments:
Would you say that this hyperreality is essentially the same idea as The Situationists 'spectacle'? They seem like the same idea, but I might be missing some nuance.
I think spectacle informs hyperreality. Like... what the consumer perceives is a mix of actual reality and the superimposed reality created by the spectacle, which is made up of mass media and representation of related commodities. So hyperreality, if I'm understanding it, would be the perceiver's notion of reality, as informed by the machinations of the spectacle. Eh?
So, from the very beginning of Society of the Spectacle.
3. The spectacle presents itself simultaneously as all of society, as part of society, and as instrument of unification. As a part of society it is specifically the sector which concentrates all gazing and all consciousness. Due to the very fact that this sector is separate, it is the common ground of the deceived gaze and of false consciousness, and the unification it achieves is nothing but an official language of generalized separation.
4. The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.
From this I take away two things:
1. That Guy Debord is a self important asshole.
2. That the spectacle is more about an agreed upon or group perception than the things we use to cause that perception.
Mind you I’m a bit uncertain about this because of [1.].
the difference between debords spectacle and the current situation or simulacrum society is that in the spectacle still theres something you can rely on to resist this very spectacular world brought out by media and the system and for that matter you could still denounce mass media etc as part of the capitalist system preventing people from realizing they are being subjected to manipulation and cultural alienation people didint realize that indulging immersing themselves in this capitalist trap they are gradually being politically demovilized as never in the history of humanity etc, in a simulacrum society or for that matter postindustrial neoliberal consemer society things arent so straigtforward you just cant fingerpoint the enemy because the system have mutated into a semiotic code or better it has coopted language by means of 30 or so years of reality banalization via tv and advertising in a such a way that makes no sense to say people is exploited when you look around and what you see is people working 10 12 hoursa day inorder to buy not objects perse but status that is commodity and consumer objects have vanished to the benefit of pure sign ,objects have become messages themselves ,they are carriers of health beauty status style ,reality which was once conflictive ,explosive it has imploded, it has gone totally conformist we have come a long way from metalurgy to semiurgy
Post a Comment